In a comment on my recent post "Be Kind," Brad, at Word Sell, asks a great question:
I'm working with a client now who has about ten bullet points, two to
six words each, that describe their services. For their Web site home
page, we're debating whether to list them alphabetically or in order of
perceived importance. For a long list, does alphabetizing make it
easier or harder on the customer?
I think alphabetizing helps in two situations:
- When you want your readers to be able to find specific items that they're looking for. (That's, of course, why indexes are alphabetized.)
- When you want your readers to know that the order of items is arbitrary. (That's why lists of co-authors of a book or article are often alphabetized. When co-authors aren't listed alphabetically, readers are entitled to assume that the order is deliberate, and that the first listed is probably the lead author.)
In other situations, like Brad's, I use the "audition" method. I pretend I'm in a band, auditioning for a club gig. The club owner asks us to play, say, three songs. Naturally, we play our three best. But in what order? My inclination: play our second best first, our third best in the middle, and our best last.
With more songs, of course, the decision gets harder. But in an audition, I see no reason to alphabetize. Doing so would deny us the chance to find a more effective order.
What does anyone else think?